E 'taken up the confrontation with the mother.
you: you have to come to America. The judge said that up to you to provide continuity of relationship and that the visits are in Latin.
I: The law says that with the "shared" it comes to attendance and visits. Attendance at a parent and from each other and not take a child at home and bring it to the other hotel. That no one forces me to keep the little Latina but forcing her to keep him with me at least one weekend per month.
No way out!
And who loses? The child and just because the mother wanted to bring it to 800 km away from the parent to its convenient and then claims that I make her comfortable: the Bank and the Baby Sitter. Until September, I indulged in this situation, basically because I wanted to keep a healthy relationship with the child because the child was too young to travel "alone" on the plane, now I can not believe that the sacrifice may be unilateral but must be shared between all three: me, the baby and mother. Is this not what you do in "normal" family? Whether you take him to the airport, take him to a 1 hour journey by plane and I take it and bring it back to the airport. All but a small sacrifice for a better life for all.
And instead she will not feel right. Only his point of view is important. There are no half measures, compromises, the verdict other than its own. Or do as you say or nisba!! If this seems like justice !?!?! And I'm the one who does not fulfill its duties as a parent? That I want to be with both of my children? We're not really sure that she does not fulfill its duty to keep the baby with me in the healthiest way possible? She prefers that it be two days in a aseptic, without stimuli (except me) and that would be guaranteed no comfort in my home.
Now it is getting so much talk around the 54/06 for its revision or integration, we finally found our fathers to justice?
0 comments:
Post a Comment